On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2022-08-18 12:11:04 -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
Mmm. So how would you, as sender or sender's mail provider, troubleshoot a
message rejected with "550 Too spammy"? I have seen several rejections that
were equally clear and to the point, without divulging any particular detail
about what, exactly, was objectionable.
I doubt that spammers take 550 messages into account, or even read them.
Agreed.
Perhaps dumping the list of SA rules that hit, absent scores. That's not a
bad violation of opsec as there are public evaluation tools available that
would return much the same information, and that would give something
helpful to discuss with the site admin when trying to resolve the
situation.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Law is too dangerous a tool to leave in the hands of
opposing tribes who just want to use it to
bludgeon one another. -- J.D. Tuccile
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: the 1943rd anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii
