On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 02:36:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Breyha wrote: > On 11/10/2022 13:29, Henrik K wrote: > > You can also need to use -D rules,rules-all to see any "unrun" rules. > > I tried that using "all,rules,rules-all" and I think I found an other > problem with RCVD_IN_DNSWL* rules. > > If I run with a testmail I see: > > # spamassassin -D all,rules,rules-all <test.eml 2>&1|grep RCVD_IN_DNSWL > > Oct 11 14:32:33.399 [1549685] dbg: rules: meta KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS inherits > > tflag net, depends on __RCVD_IN_DNSWL > > Oct 11 14:32:33.595 [1549685] dbg: dnseval: initialize check_rbl_sub for > > rule RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, set dnswl-firsttrusted, subtest > > (?^aa:^127\\.0\\.\\d+\\.0$) > > Oct 11 14:32:33.595 [1549685] dbg: dnseval: initialize check_rbl_sub for > > rule RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, set dnswl-firsttrusted, subtest > > (?^aa:^127\\.0\\.\\d+\\.1$) > > Oct 11 14:32:33.595 [1549685] dbg: dnseval: initialize check_rbl_sub for > > rule RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, set dnswl-firsttrusted, subtest > > (?^aa:^127\\.0\\.\\d+\\.2$) > > Oct 11 14:32:33.595 [1549685] dbg: dnseval: initialize check_rbl_sub for > > rule RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, set dnswl-firsttrusted, subtest > > (?^aa:^127\\.0\\.\\d+\\.3$) > > Oct 11 14:32:33.595 [1549685] dbg: dnseval: initialize check_rbl_sub for > > rule RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, set dnswl-firsttrusted, subtest > > (?^aa:^127\\.0\\.\\d+\\.255$) > > Oct 11 14:32:33.627 [1549685] dbg: rules-all: ran meta rule > > __RCVD_IN_DNSWL, no hit > > Oct 11 14:32:34.462 [1549685] dbg: rules-all: unrun dependencies prevented > > meta KAM_BAD_DNSWL from running: KAM_MESSAGE_EMAILBL_PCCC, > > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W > > Oct 11 14:32:34.464 [1549685] dbg: rules-all: unrun dependencies prevented > > meta KAM_QUITE_BAD_DNSWL from running: KAM_MESSAGE_EMAILBL_PCCC, > > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W > > Oct 11 14:32:34.466 [1549685] dbg: rules-all: unrun dependencies prevented > > meta XPRIO from running: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE > > Oct 11 14:32:34.466 [1549685] dbg: rules-all: unrun dependencies prevented > > meta WLCOMPENSATE1 from running: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED > > Oct 11 14:32:34.466 [1549685] dbg: rules-all: unrun dependencies prevented > > meta WLCOMPENSATE2 from running: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW > > Oct 11 14:32:34.466 [1549685] dbg: rules-all: unrun dependencies prevented > > meta WLCOMPENSATE4 from running: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI > > This looks like __RCVD_IN_DNSWL gets evaluated, but not hit. But > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* are "unrun", what looks very odd.
This is because __RCVD_IN_DNSWL is not supposed to be a meta. KAM channel overrides it to "disable" the rule. I just posted on the list about that..
