it would at best end in the rule get such a low score that it is
the same as disable it entirely - so the only correct thing to do
is stop the foolish deep-header parsing
why?
because *then* it would no longer hit any relevant amount of ham
and QA corpus over time could score it higher in a safe way
If that were supported by the corpus it would already have
happened
how do you suppose the corpus to replace ones own thinking about the
*conditions* rules hit?
I've no idea what the sentence means.
On 03.03.16 20:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
the deep-header rules have to go away or rewritten to *not* do
deep-header tests - was that really so hard to parse?
If they really were so useless, they would get zero score. They did not.
I why are you complaining (again), when you can simply zero the score, when
you have no problem highly tuning other scores.
Maybe you could better find out other common characteristics of messages
hitting those scores and post results here so we see what to exclude.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
2B|!2B, that's a question!
