Am 03.03.2016 um 19:39 schrieb RW:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 18:51:45 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote:Am 03.03.2016 um 17:54 schrieb RW:On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 15:18:36 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote:it would at best end in the rule get such a low score that it is the same as disable it entirely - so the only correct thing to do is stop the foolish deep-header parsing why? because *then* it would no longer hit any relevant amount of ham and QA corpus over time could score it higher in a safe wayIf that were supported by the corpus it would already have happenedhow do you suppose the corpus to replace ones own thinking about the *conditions* rules hit?I've no idea what the sentence means.
the deep-header rules have to go away or rewritten to *not* do deep-header tests - was that really so hard to parse?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
