On 03/03/2016 09:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.03.2016 um 20:59 schrieb Axb:
On 03/03/2016 08:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
how do you suppose the corpus to replace ones own thinking about the
*conditions* rules hit?
I've no idea what the sentence means.
the deep-header rules have to go away or rewritten to *not* do
deep-header tests - was that really so hard to parse?
That YOU don't like deep header parsing rule doesn't mean that they're
useless.
Maybe it's time that you, as a self proclamied perfectionist, fork SA
and do your thing.
maybe *you* just start ignore posts where *you* think they are wrong,
the statements about rules of this thread are *not* only from *my*
networks - other sysadmins with different customers came to the same
conclusions and even reported the problems to me
*so what* is your problem?
shut down the mailing list if you only want posts defending *your* own
opinions and realize that others also have their expierence, sometimes
even more than you or other developers
you want to ignore it?
*just do it* - i don't care
but don't expect others to only post things confirming *your* opinion
and step a little back from your "i am a SA developer and so i am always
right" attitude
You're totally right. You're bad for my blood pressure.
There were times when this list was an inspiring place to be in. Times
change... I'm outta here.
