Am 03.03.2016 um 17:54 schrieb RW:
What make this all the more remarkable is that at the time you brought it up, the meta rules were wrong and most of the hits that should have gone to FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_1 were going to FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 instead, so you probably overestimated the spam hitting the deep rule
a HELO on the submission server deep in the received headers don't count as good spam sign - nothing would change that
that was clear ham and the only BARE_IP was a early received haeder a wrong hit of FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_1 would have been even worser score FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_1 2.598 1.426 3.099 2.347 score FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 1.498 1.499 1.498 1.49
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
