On 12/29/10 8:29 AM, "Jack L. Stone" <ja...@sage-american.com> wrote:
>
> Very comprehensive coverage. All of my net checks are done at the MTA level
> (sendmail) and none in SA -- it's turned off. What is the benefit of
> checking twice? Maybe I missed the benefit.
The benefit lies in RBLs that have FP's. You may not think that all hosts
on uce-protect are spammers (indeed, they declare that in some of their
lists they intentionally cause collateral damage to get the attention of
certain ISPs). So, I don't want a host that shows up on uce-protect to be
summarily rejected. But, if they show up on uce-protect *and* they have
several other spam spoor, I'd like to be able to take that as a weighted
factor.
> Thanks for this discussion as it is good to keep up with those effective BLs.
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281
