On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 19:05 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: > Whoa. Ted please calm down. I think you read too much into this and > are seriously overreacting. I didn't propose immediately replacing > NJABL with <something else> like mailspike. I was only pointing out > that NJABL was performing very poorly, to such an extent that you're > better off removing it because it is needlessly using your resources. > In effect my proposal makes nearly zero difference to SpamAssassin's > current performance because these rules are nearly useless. >
Makes little difference anywhere, I used it amongst others at MTA level. NJABL used to be good 4 or 5 years back, but in recent years, it rarely gets a hit, it always falls back to spamcop/sorbs/spamhaus
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
