Whoa.  Ted please calm down.  I think you read too much into this and are
seriously overreacting.  I didn't propose immediately replacing NJABL with
<something else> like mailspike.  I was only pointing out that NJABL was
performing very poorly, to such an extent that you're better off removing it
because it is needlessly using your resources.  In effect my proposal makes
nearly zero difference to SpamAssassin's current performance because these
rules are nearly useless.

The process of adding new DNSBL's to the official spamassassin rules is very
lengthy.  Among the things we need to improve/verify for eligibility: As you
have correctly noted, the website of Mailspike needs improvements.  Then we
need to ask about the robustness of the mirror network.  Then ask for
clarification about future plans for taking it private and demanding money
from users.  I also know about other measures to further improve Mailspike's
performance.

Masschecks have confirmed for over a year now that Mailspike's performance
is awesome.  Even after the above things are done, it still might be months
or even a year before SpamAssassin uses it as a default rule, because
current policies seem to allow for big changes like this only at major
releases like 3.4.0.

It seems we need a general discussion about rule update policies and
procedures, soon to happen on dev@ list.

Warren

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Sahil Tandon <sa...@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 22:44:09 +0000, João Gouveia wrote:
>
> > Again, a bit harsh, but I see your point.  We shall improve the web
> > site whenever possible.  As everything free (and we would like to keep
> > it that way), it's kind of subject to time+effort constraints, and
> > typically we prefer to make use of that improving the efficiency of
> > the list, and not so much working on the web site..
>
> João, please do not be discouraged by the ranting.  We use mailspike at
> multiple sites and it is a valuable, low-FP addition to the DNSBL
> arsenal.  Thanks for your efforts.
>
> --
> Sahil Tandon <sa...@freebsd.org>
>

Reply via email to