Yeah sorry, I was confused by the subject line which mislead me to think the point was about whether or not NJABL is still a functioning DNSBL. Silly me.
-- Neil Schwartzman Senior Director, Security Strategy Email Intelligence Group Return Path Inc. +1 (303) 999-3217 AIM: returnpathcanuk http://www.returnpath.net/blog/received/ From: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtog...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:14:45 -0700 To: Neil Schwartzman <neil.schwartz...@returnpath.net>, SA Users <users@spamassassin.apache.org> Subject: Re: NJABL is dead? Folks here are missing the point, that NJABL is catching not much of anything, like less than 1% of spam, and with a relatively high FP ratio. I don't understand this desire to keep such a poor performing rule, especially when it costs a network query. Warren
