On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:02:58 -0800 Marc Perkel <supp...@junkemailfilter.com> wrote:
> > > On 11/18/2010 9:55 AM, RW wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:00:48 +0100 > > Benny Pedersen<m...@junc.org> wrote: > > > >> On tor 18 nov 2010 12:59:38 CET, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote > >>> On 16.11.10 07:48, Marc Perkel wrote: > >>>> Spammer can and do use SPF so it's not a good white list either. > >>>> If SPF is correct and the domain is in my white list then I'll > >>>> pass it as white. > >>> we call this "shitting into one's own mouth". > >> Marc have you seen spf scores in spamassassin ? > >> > >> why is spf_pass not giving -100 as default ? > > What he actually wrote was "If SPF is correct and the domain is in > > my white list" which is is equivalent to USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST. > > That does score -100 and has no scatological implications. > > > Spammers can and do set SPF records too. Presumably not for domains in your whitelist. I'm not sure what you are saying here.
