On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:00:48 +0100 Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.org> wrote:
> On tor 18 nov 2010 12:59:38 CET, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote > > On 16.11.10 07:48, Marc Perkel wrote: > >> Spammer can and do use SPF so it's not a good white list either. > >> If SPF is correct and the domain is in my white list then I'll > >> pass it as white. > > we call this "shitting into one's own mouth". > > Marc have you seen spf scores in spamassassin ? > > why is spf_pass not giving -100 as default ? What he actually wrote was "If SPF is correct and the domain is in my white list" which is is equivalent to USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST. That does score -100 and has no scatological implications.
