On 11/18/2010 9:55 AM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:00:48 +0100
Benny Pedersen<m...@junc.org> wrote:
On tor 18 nov 2010 12:59:38 CET, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote
On 16.11.10 07:48, Marc Perkel wrote:
Spammer can and do use SPF so it's not a good white list either.
If SPF is correct and the domain is in my white list then I'll
pass it as white.
we call this "shitting into one's own mouth".
Marc have you seen spf scores in spamassassin ?
why is spf_pass not giving -100 as default ?
What he actually wrote was "If SPF is correct and the domain is in my
white list" which is is equivalent to USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST. That does
score -100 and has no scatological implications.
Spammers can and do set SPF records too.
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400