Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>
> Stupid question here, but are you sure you are training the same
> database that SA is using?
>
> This is a fairly frequent problem. Common cases are:
>
> 1) SA being called as 'mailuser' and you are doing manual training on
> root's database.
> 2) You are manually training everything to the 'mailuser' database, but
> SA is actually using per-user databases.
>
> --
> Bowie
>
>
Good question Bowie.
I don't think that's happening. We do have a generic system-wide procmailrc
but it's first command is for a DROPPRIVS, which I think/thought then runs
as the specific user and in the procmail recipe a call is then made to spamc
(although it is called without the -u option because, as I say, I think by
issuing a DROPPRIVS it's running as that user so -u shouldn't be necessary).
If this doesn't sound right, by all means say - it's quite a while since i
set all this up!
Training is definitely happening on a per user basis (ie. the script is
calling sa-learn -u).
Thanks, David.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Text-contained-in-HTML-comments-causing-BAYES_00-to-classify-as-non-spam-tp29342874p29351529.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
