On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Happy Chap wrote:
In that case (and I've been barking up the wrong tree) do you have any
suggestion as to what my next move should be to try to trap this type of
spam? I'm moderately technical, but I think I've probably reached the
limit of my current knowledge but am happy to learn if you could just
point me in the right direction.
Apart from BAYES_00 what rules are they hitting? Would they be classified
as spam if Bayes wasn't a factor?
If that's the case, then train them as spam an you should be okay.
Regardless, 3.2.3 will be much less effective than 3.3.x and will only be
getting critical bugfixes (if anything) via sa-update. You should plan on
upgrading soon.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
USMC Rules of Gunfighting #7: In ten years nobody will remember the
details of caliber, stance, or tactics. They will only remember who
lived.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: the 275th anniversary of John Peter Zenger's acquittal
