Henrik K wrote:
>
>
> Instead of speculating, try:
>
> cat msg | spamassassin -t -D bayes 2>&1 | grep bayes:
>
> It will tell you exactly what tokens are considered.
>
>
Hi Henrik,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm not sure I totally understand all of the output to that, but I think
that's telling me that it isn't taking the text in the comments into account
- I can see various strings that it's picking up from the email, but the
commented text isn't obviously there. Maybe that's what you were trying to
tell me anyway :-)
In that case (and I've been barking up the wrong tree) do you have any
suggestion as to what my next move should be to try to trap this type of
spam? I'm moderately technical, but I think I've probably reached the limit
of my current knowledge but am happy to learn if you could just point me in
the right direction.
Thanks, David.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Text-contained-in-HTML-comments-causing-BAYES_00-to-classify-as-non-spam-tp29342874p29346570.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
