Bowie Bailey wrote: > > On 8/4/2010 4:23 AM, Happy Chap wrote: > > You ARE manually training bayes (sa-learn) on these missed spams, > right? That is probably the most useful thing you can do if you are > getting Bayes_00 on them. > >
Hi Bowie, oh yes, every night. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Text-contained-in-HTML-comments-causing-BAYES_00-to-classify-as-non-spam-tp29342874p29350820.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
