On 29/05/09 9:32 AM, "Andy Dorman" <ador...@ironicdesign.com> wrote:
> Neil Schwartzman wrote: >> >> Given the huge amount of bumph I've seen and heard about emailreg.org, I >> figured it would be an interesting experiment to see if what everybody >> feared was happening was true. It isn't. No big extortion plan on the part >> of emailreg and Barracuda that I can see. >> > Neil, I certainly respect what you are saying based on the information you > have. > > However, I have a fact to toss out about emailreg.org. > > I run a small email filtering company with a small cluster of servers for load > balancing and reliability. In early April I found I was unable to send email > to > a new customer. They were currently using the Barracuda Networks Reputation > system and it was blocking my emails. I found this somewhat silly considering > we receive over 500 million emails a month but rarely ever SEND email (we only > filter incoming email so far). ie, our outgoing email is mostly just business > correspondence and filter stats reports to our customers. > > And then I got to emailreg.org and found that: > [...] > Just wanted you to have ALL the facts when considering emailreg.org. Hold up now. Why did you goto emailreg.org?? That is the whitelisting service. I'd go ahead and request a delist at http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl/removal-request Worked well for me. -- Neil Schwartzman Director, Accreditation Security & Standards Certified | Safelist Return Path Inc. 0142002038
