Guys -- vague hints as to the contents of the mail really don't help. It's spam -- we're all getting thousands of spams a day, most of us (ok, I for one at least) seem to be finding those going into the spam bins without our help, and I'd say it's unlikely that many of us (ok, me again ;) are going to go rooting through the trash there looking for something that seems to match what you're hinting at.
Why not just post a spample, or a link to one? --j. Joe Zitnik writes: > >>> On 12/1/2006 at 5:22 AM, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 01 December 2006 00:29, Loren Wilton wrote: > > guess you're just lucky. I just went through the last month's spam > and I > > can't find anything with a subject about credit ratings. > > Oh, no, I didn't mean to suggest it was in the subject. > > Its usually some random subject. Then a paragraph starting with "your > credit > rating doesn't matter to us" with the usual misspellings, etc, followed > by > (usually) a geocities link and some random text at the end. > > -- > _____________________________________ > John Andersen > > > I was wondering the same thing. Even given the random text, I would > think between the default rules, and the fact that I've dumped a bunch > in to bayes, that the spammy content would be enough to nail them for > sure. I'm still seeing a significant number skate by.
