On Thursday 30 November 2006 21:11, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > John Andersen wrote: > > How is it these spams slip under the radar with such low scores? > > They seldom score about 3.1 in my setup even with network tests > > and bayes (SA 3.1.7). > > I don't think I've seen such a spam pass as ham, although you've been > quite vague.
Other than a fat fingering of the keyboard, I thought it was pretty clear. I was talking about the "your credit rating doesn't matter to us" spams. They never score ABOVE 3.1 here until they find their way to sorbs.. They never hit Razor due to the gibberish at the end. They usually get tagged by bayes, but bayes alone just gets them near 3. They sneak past SURBL. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
pgpjmL2Xo74De.pgp
Description: PGP signature
