>>> On 12/1/2006 at 5:22 AM, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 01 December 2006 00:29, Loren Wilton wrote: > guess you're just lucky. I just went through the last month's spam and I > can't find anything with a subject about credit ratings.
Oh, no, I didn't mean to suggest it was in the subject. Its usually some random subject. Then a paragraph starting with "your credit rating doesn't matter to us" with the usual misspellings, etc, followed by (usually) a geocities link and some random text at the end. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen I was wondering the same thing. Even given the random text, I would think between the default rules, and the fact that I've dumped a bunch in to bayes, that the spammy content would be enough to nail them for sure. I'm still seeing a significant number skate by.
