From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow writes:
From: "Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
>> they all work.
>>
>> Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
>> RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without configuring about 62
>> sa-update channels (one for each ruleset RDJ manages).
>>
>
> True, but doesnt that make more sense than having 2 separate programs
> which both pull down updated rules for SA, but from 2 different locations?
Nor does it make sense to use a tool, even if supplied with SpamAssassin,
that is broken for performing updates.
what's the "broken" part?
Channels "sounds" like a most awkward way of putting it all together.
I figure two tools is not a bad thing. I have my working RDJ substitute
(created more or less synchronously with RDJ) so I figure to continue
using it and use update only for the SA native rules.
One thing concerns me - if both SARE and native rules are dynamically
changing managing scores becomes "awkward" to say the least when rules
overlap.
{^_^}
