On 26-Jul-06, at 4:00 AM, Rolf Kraeuchi wrote: Gino Cerullo schrieb: [...] Hey, I never claimed checking and rejecting before DATA to be ready for 'large scale' deployments. ;-) But, I have to say that in the six months that I've been doing it I've never had a false positive. <knocks on wood> Also, I've been publishing an SPF record for over two years and again, I've never had a problem with mail being rejected, misdirected or lost.
The truth is that there is no reason for any domain not to be able to publish SPF records that end in at least a SOFTFAIL (~all). [...]
Well, maybe there is. Doesn't SA score SOFTFAIL with more than 1 point?
regards, rolf
No, the default scores are as follows.
SOFT_FAIL 0.5 FAIL 0.9
-- Gino Cerullo
Pixel Point Studios 21 Chesham Drive Toronto, ON M3M 1W6
T: 416-247-7740 F: 416-247-7503
|
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
