-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gino Cerullo wrote: > > On 27-Jul-06, at 4:32 PM, Hamish wrote: > >> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 17:25, Marc Perkel wrote: >>> Benny Pedersen wrote: >>>> On Tue, July 25, 2006 18:51, Marc Perkel wrote: >>>>> SPF breaks email forwarding. My users use forwarding. >>>> >>>> fair, but why not stop using forwarding ? >>> >>> Because my customers want to use forwarding. >> >> Perhaps it would be fairer to say that SPF is fine but the >> forwarding is >> broken. >> >> Forwarding should (IMO) be implemented in such a way as the >> FORWARDING mailbox >> should be used as the new return-path (Just like if you forwarded >> an email >> from your MUA rather than with the MDA). Then both SPF and >> forwarding would >> work fine. And furthermore be consistent. >> >> >> Hamish. > > That's the basic idea behind SRS. The forwarding server re-writes > the header and takes responsibility for the forwarded email. >
Huh. Fancy that, I never looked at SRS. (But do use SPF and markup on it in SA). (Although not for my home domain because the DNS is with register.com and they don't do TXT records). H -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEydI2/3QXwQQkZYwRAv+5AJsE03rlRqMu2uj1XCG2t3gvtiInPQCg22Pb T/W0uJdLDBZDyOL0Yr6f6cI= =1x8q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
