On Fri, 6 May 2005, Stewart, John wrote:
>
> > > I'm starting to see references in messages that look like this:
> > >
> > > www.achat-montre-rolex.net./
>
> >
> > Upgrade to SA-2.6.4+SpamCopURI, catches those just fine. ;)
> >
>
> I'm running 2.6.4 with SpamCopURI - is this being flagged on your install as
> being in the URI-BL? This email wasn't tagged here as such... all I get is:
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,
> BAYES_40, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL
Yes, all the discussions on this list that contain the above text
are being flagged by my SA as hitting the OB SURBL list.
That particular host/URL is only registered in the OB list, do you
have a check against:
check_spamcop_uri_rbl('multi.surbl.org','127.0.0.0+16')
in your spamcop_uri.cf (or what ever ".cf" that you've got your
check_spamcop_uri_rbl rules)?
Also which version of SpamCopURI are you running? (need 0.22 or newer).
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
