On Friday, May 6, 2005, 3:23:56 PM, John Stewart wrote: > I upgraded just the other day (at which point I suspect I broke something) > as I saw on a site somewhere that 2.6.3 was vulnerable to a DOS attack. I > upgraded to 2.6.4 for SA, and 0.25 for SpamCopURI
> Grepping through my messages file, it looks like the only URI_RBL rule I've > seen triggered is SPAMCOP_URI_RBL; none of the others have been triggered at > all. There should be lots of hits on the other SURBL rules too. Probably you have contradictory installation/conf dirs or something similar. Recall that SpamCopURI is technically a patch and should be installed after SA, so SpamCopURI can patch SA. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
