On 26.07.21 08:40, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Correct. The fact that there are some scores that add up to approximately
-0.2 is negligible when compared to a standard threshold of 5.0.
Do you have false positives being caused by these emails? Do you have false
negatives? That's more important to look at then just focusing on one set
of rules.
to be more precise, I have case where these caused mail to be autolearned as
ham which is even worse than a FN
I tried to filter out other rules that could cause it.
Unfortunately no other rules hit that could avoid trainin.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> writes:
> I noticed that pure existence of DKIM signature can push score under zero:
>
> DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
>
> ...so the cumulative score is -0.2.
>
> I'm aware that we don't have many rules with negative scores, but
multiple
> scores for single valid DKIM sinature should not be redundant.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory.
