On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:05:35 +0100 RW wrote:
> "&& !DKIM_SIGNED " means the rule can only be true if there's no > signature, so none of the terms with __DKIM_DEPENDABLE, DKIM_VALID, > and DKIM_VALID_AU make any difference. Actually it's worse than that __DKIM_DEPENDABLE is always true if there are no signatures, so !DKIM_SIGNED && !__DKIM_DEPENDABLE is always false. The ruleqa shows one hit on XPRIO.
