On 2021-07-26 14:40, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Correct. The fact that there are some scores that add up to
approximately -0.2 is negligible when compared to a standard threshold
of 5.0.
Do you have false positives being caused by these emails? Do you have
false negatives? That's more important to look at then just focusing
on one set of rules.
i bet when spamassassin 4.0.0 is out there would be more problems :=)
all senders can make dkim pass, all senders can make spf pass, all
recipients want to solve this, lol
now to the mix, openarc try to pass forward originating dkim/spf pass or
fails to forwarded recipients, to be retested in dmarc stage, but
opendmarc is not ready yet since only opendmarc in trunk support it
still (AR header parsing)
in spamassassin 4.0.0 it will be dmarc testing not trustness on forged
headers anyway, will spamassassin evaluate arc chains ?, hope it will
if anything should change it could be change scores so its not fyssicly
seen as -0.1 for each negative scores but more of a 0 score while its
really in perl is -0.01, that make it more stronger not counting much,
while not breaking anything
its still raining......
