Hello, I noticed that pure existence of DKIM signature can push score under zero:
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ...so the cumulative score is -0.2. I'm aware that we don't have many rules with negative scores, but multiple scores for single valid DKIM sinature should not be redundant. do you people modify scores of these rules? I would turn both off, but DKIM_VALID is used in some meta rules... score DKIM_VALID -0.001 score DKIM_VALID_EF -0.001 I have also tuned tflags, for sure: tflags DKIM_VALID noautolearn net nice tflags DKIM_VALID_EF noautolearn net nice BTW, looking at metas in 72_active.cf: meta XPRIO __XPRIO_MINFP && !DKIM_SIGNED && !__DKIM_DEPENDABLE && !DKIM_VALID && !DKIM_VALID_AU && !RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE meta XPRIO __XPRIO_MINFP && !DKIM_SIGNED && !__DKIM_DEPENDABLE && !DKIM_VALID && !DKIM_VALID_AU && !RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE && !SPF_PASS !DKIM_VALID && !DKIM_VALID_AU is redundant and !DKIM_VALID_AU should be enough meta __HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST_MINFP HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST && !__HAS_SENDER && !__THREADED && !__HAS_THREAD_INDEX && !ALL_TRUSTED && !__NOT_SPOOFED && !__HDRS_LCASE_KNOWN && !DKIM_VALID meta __NOT_SPOOFED DKIM_VALID || !__LAST_EXTERNAL_RELAY_NO_AUTH || ALL_TRUSTED # yes DKIM, no SPF meta __NOT_SPOOFED SPF_PASS || DKIM_VALID || !__LAST_EXTERNAL_RELAY_NO_AUTH || ALL_TRUSTED # yes DKIM, yes SPF shouldn't these contain DKIM_VALID_AU instead? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. A day without sunshine is like, night.
