On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:07:11AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > On 19 April 2014 04:31, Thomas Cameron <thomas.came...@camerontech.com> wrote: > > On 04/15/2014 10:40 PM, Digimer wrote: > >> > >> Please don't do that. Fedora is awesome, but it's a desktop OS, not a > >> server OS. The life cycle is way to short and it's not hardened like a > >> server-focused distro. RHEL/CentOS would make a much better OS, and if > >> you needed something newer than it offers, check the EPEL repo. > > > > Bull. It absolutely is QA'd and it absolutely is hardened. It is > > protected by essentially the same or even newer security technologies as > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux - SELinux, SSL, disk encryption, iptables, etc. > > > > No firewall... ;) (for those following the devel list, for everyone > else it *does* have a firewall. For the time being.)
I just read a few messages on the thread; this is utterly stupid! I do not understand why compromising security for "just works" feel is a worthy idea. In my experience, none of the "just works" scenarios actually just works, there is always some minimal fiddling necessary. For the interested: <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-April/198041.html> -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
