I like it! Welcome back :)
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote: > Back form vacations... ;-) > > How about naming it like their use cases... > > interview, conference and presentation (presentation would be the former > restricted room)? German translation would be "Interview", "Konferenz" and > "Präsentation". > > Greetings Peter > > > Am 15.08.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >> >> This thread it too silent :((( >> I have strong feeling 3.3.1 is ready to be released >> shall we rename restricted room type before release? >> >> or maybe we shall rename it in 4.0.0? >> >> or let it remain restricted? >> >> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Yakovlev N. <yakovlev...@krvostok.ru> >> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, I agree. >>> >>> RESTRICTED is not an appropriate word and should be replaced. >>> >>> Maybe.. CONTROLLED? LIMITED? >>> >>> I do not insist.. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 11:13 AM >>> To: Openmeetings user-list >>> Subject: [DISCUSSION] Rename of restricted room type >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> >>> >>> It seems 'restricted' room type is very much confusing for ex. "Public >>> Restricted Room" >>> >>> For regular user it sounds like "room with limited functionality" >>> >>> >>> >>> Maybe it worth to rename it to be 'moderated' or 'audience' or maybe >>> someone >>> can propose better name? >>> >>> >>> >>> It would be also good change to review translations: [1] and maybe bring >>> them up to date :)) >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/tree/3.3.x/openmeetings-web/src/main/java/org/apache/openmeetings/web/app >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
