This thread it too silent :((( I have strong feeling 3.3.1 is ready to be released shall we rename restricted room type before release?
or maybe we shall rename it in 4.0.0? or let it remain restricted? On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Yakovlev N. <yakovlev...@krvostok.ru> wrote: > Yes, I agree. > > RESTRICTED is not an appropriate word and should be replaced. > > Maybe.. CONTROLLED? LIMITED? > > I do not insist.. > > > > From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 11:13 AM > To: Openmeetings user-list > Subject: [DISCUSSION] Rename of restricted room type > > > > Hello All, > > > > It seems 'restricted' room type is very much confusing for ex. "Public > Restricted Room" > > For regular user it sounds like "room with limited functionality" > > > > Maybe it worth to rename it to be 'moderated' or 'audience' or maybe someone > can propose better name? > > > > It would be also good change to review translations: [1] and maybe bring > them up to date :)) > > > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/tree/3.3.x/openmeetings-web/src/main/java/org/apache/openmeetings/web/app > > > > -- > > WBR > Maxim aka solomax -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
