Back form vacations... ;-)
How about naming it like their use cases...
interview, conference and presentation (presentation would be the former
restricted room)? German translation would be "Interview", "Konferenz"
and "Präsentation".
Greetings Peter
Am 15.08.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
This thread it too silent :(((
I have strong feeling 3.3.1 is ready to be released
shall we rename restricted room type before release?
or maybe we shall rename it in 4.0.0?
or let it remain restricted?
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Yakovlev N. <yakovlev...@krvostok.ru> wrote:
Yes, I agree.
RESTRICTED is not an appropriate word and should be replaced.
Maybe.. CONTROLLED? LIMITED?
I do not insist..
From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 11:13 AM
To: Openmeetings user-list
Subject: [DISCUSSION] Rename of restricted room type
Hello All,
It seems 'restricted' room type is very much confusing for ex. "Public
Restricted Room"
For regular user it sounds like "room with limited functionality"
Maybe it worth to rename it to be 'moderated' or 'audience' or maybe someone
can propose better name?
It would be also good change to review translations: [1] and maybe bring
them up to date :))
[1]
https://github.com/apache/openmeetings/tree/3.3.x/openmeetings-web/src/main/java/org/apache/openmeetings/web/app
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
