On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > I volunteer to help moderate. > St.Ack > > Sorry. Changed my mind. I'm not going to do more work because of Michael. Let the filters do the work for us. Ban him for 3 months. St.Ack
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> (I took the liberty of moving us off of Ted's feature discussion thread) >> >> A three month ban sounds better than a permanent ban. But it still seems >> likely to just result in the ban-ee walking away from teh community or >> escalating. >> >> Would we consider enforcing moderation on posts for the three month period >> instead of an outright ban? >> >> It's more work for whomever has moderator rights on the mailing list, but >> it provides a better feedback cycle for improved behavior. Presuming that >> I >> don't already have such access as a PMC member, I'd be willing to >> volunteer >> to help take on part of the burden. >> >> -Sean >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > It was suggested privately that we try a temporary ban first, to be >> clear >> > that current behavior and communication is unacceptable and won't be >> > tolerated further, yet allow for the possibility of a return to the >> > community should the message be received. So let me amend my proposal - >> a >> > three month temporary ban. >> > >> > Also, the reason I am asking for public feedback before calling for a >> vote >> > is this would be the first time in the history of the project we would >> take >> > this very unfortunate step. It pains me personally but enough is >> enough, in >> > my opinion. However, if you are not comfortable with that then please >> speak >> > up and I won't ask the PMC to vote on this. >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > I've had enough and would like to ask the user and dev communities if >> > they >> > > would mind if we vote on a permanent ban of Michael Segal - any and >> all >> > > email accounts he may choose to set up - from all HBase mailing lists. >> > The >> > > basic lack of courtesy and constant naysaying is corrosive. Nobody >> trying >> > > to volunteer their time here deserves his continuing abuse. >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Michael Segel < >> > [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Sean, >> > >> >> > >> You’re a developer, or just some higher level primate that pounds >> code? >> > >> >> > >> I don’t want to embarrass you, but what do they teach in engineering >> > >> schools these days? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > >> > - Andy >> > >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> > (via Tom White) >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sean >> > >
