On 09/04/12 16:46, Colin Law wrote: > On 9 April 2012 16:18, Bruno Girin <brunogi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 09/04/12 15:16, Colin Law wrote: >>> On 9 April 2012 14:37, Alan Bell <alan.b...@libertus.co.uk> wrote: >>>> On 09/04/12 11:20, Steve wrote: >>>>> The problem is not with the journalist but, Ubuntu. The explanations as >>>>> to what is going on with these settings can best be described as vague. >>>>> Until Alan's explanation I wasn't sure what they're for. I've submitted >>>>> a >>>>> bug #977106 to LP if people would like to add to it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> well apart from tossing in the word "zeitgeist" (which nobody really >>>> understands and would be called jargon or gobbledygook geek stuff by most >>>> people) I don't really see what my explanation added over the default text >>>> that is on the screenshots and there to be read. What was the bit I said >>>> that was helpful compared to what is there already? >>> I think that your comments made it clear /where/ the information is >>> being stored (on the PC not off on the internet somewhere) and /why/ >>> (for the users convenience not for snooping purposes). You may think >>> that these things are obvious but that is not necessarily correct. >> That sounds like the sort of details that should go in the existing bug >> report to help clarify it: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/activity-log-manager/+bug/967056 >> >> Colin, do you want to do that so that you can express it in your own >> words? Otherwise I'm happy to add more details to the comments so that >> the developers understand the nature of the problem. I should probably >> install activity-log-manager so that I can see for myself what the whole >> thing is about :-) > I have added my comments, but anyone with any input should do the same I > think.
I've added my own comment to the bug report, mostly in line with what you say. Bruno -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
