On 9 April 2012 16:18, Bruno Girin <brunogi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/04/12 15:16, Colin Law wrote: >> On 9 April 2012 14:37, Alan Bell <alan.b...@libertus.co.uk> wrote: >>> On 09/04/12 11:20, Steve wrote: >>>> >>>> The problem is not with the journalist but, Ubuntu. The explanations as >>>> to what is going on with these settings can best be described as vague. >>>> Until Alan's explanation I wasn't sure what they're for. I've submitted a >>>> bug #977106 to LP if people would like to add to it. >>>> >>>> >>> well apart from tossing in the word "zeitgeist" (which nobody really >>> understands and would be called jargon or gobbledygook geek stuff by most >>> people) I don't really see what my explanation added over the default text >>> that is on the screenshots and there to be read. What was the bit I said >>> that was helpful compared to what is there already? >> I think that your comments made it clear /where/ the information is >> being stored (on the PC not off on the internet somewhere) and /why/ >> (for the users convenience not for snooping purposes). You may think >> that these things are obvious but that is not necessarily correct. > > That sounds like the sort of details that should go in the existing bug > report to help clarify it: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/activity-log-manager/+bug/967056 > > Colin, do you want to do that so that you can express it in your own > words? Otherwise I'm happy to add more details to the comments so that > the developers understand the nature of the problem. I should probably > install activity-log-manager so that I can see for myself what the whole > thing is about :-)
I have added my comments, but anyone with any input should do the same I think. Colin -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
