Lol, Good get-out clause Am I allowed to 'lol'? ;)
On Wed, November 23, 2011 10:31, Alan Bell wrote: > The logical solution to this debate is to start the practice of sandwich > posting, in which your reply is placed at the top, as per top posting, > and then copied and pasted verbatim to the bottom, thereby bottom > posting. Threads can then be read chronologically from the middle in > either direction, making everyone equally confused. > Or you could trim and quote as context requires. > > Alan > > On 23/11/11 10:10, Norman Silverstone wrote: >> <snip> >>> Do you make a point of bottom posting regardless of the recipient's >>> style? >>> Or do you just stay 'bothered' inside but think 'what's the point' and >>> just top-post? >>> >> I am not a computer nerd, just an 'old codger'. When I started to use >> email I was instructed to put my remarks after the lines upon which I >> was commenting and to snip out superfluous material. No further comment. >> >> Norman >> >> > > The logical solution to this debate is to start the practice of sandwich > posting, in which your reply is placed at the top, as per top posting, > and then copied and pasted verbatim to the bottom, thereby bottom > posting. Threads can then be read chronologically from the middle in > either direction, making everyone equally confused. > Or you could trim and quote as context requires. > > Alan > > -- > Libertus Solutions http://libertus.co.uk > > > -- > ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ > Lol, Good get-out clause Am I allowed to 'lol'? ;) -- Thanks and regards, Jon Reynolds ---------------------------- http://www.jcrdevelopments.com -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
