On Wed, November 23, 2011 10:07, Philip Stubbs wrote: > ...At work, my boss > may have a long back and forth with a supplier, and then suddenly > include me with a 'What do you think?' type message. In that > situation, I am glad that they have top posted, including all the old > messages, as I can then look back and see what has already been > covered by all parties.
Not sure I get this bit, wouldn't that be a great argument for bottom-posting? You suddenly get copied in on a conversation type email and have to make sense of the flow. Reading it from top to bottom in chronological order (like a conversation in a novel) would be easier. With top-posted back and forth type conversations, you have to go to the bottom, read, then scroll up, then read down, etc... -- Thanks and regards, Jon Reynolds (j0nr) ---------------------------- http://www.jcrdevelopments.com -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/