On 29 November 2011 10:13, James Tait <james.t...@wyrddreams.org> wrote: > On 28/11/11 10:07, Colin Law wrote: >> >> On 28 November 2011 09:44, Jon Reynolds<maill...@jcrdevelopments.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, November 24, 2011 19:36, Liam Proven wrote: >>> Would you say your signature should be at the complete bottom, including >>> all quoted text, or just after your immediate reply? >> >> >> I would say that if your signature is, almost literally, a signature >> (so your name and maybe one or two additional lines) then put it >> inline, as I do. Any more than this then put your name after your >> last line of posting, in order to terminate the posting and put the >> rest of the rubbish at the bottom so that nobody has to look at it >> (they never read it anyway so even better not to include it at all). > > > I agree with the last part of what you said - if it's not relevant, get rid > of it. Logically, then, your signature will be the last thing in your > e-mail - so both "at the complete bottom" and "just after your immediate > reply" are true.
That is only true if the last part of your reply is at the bottom. See my previous posting where I signed it, but left some of the previous post after my reply as it was still relevant to the message. Colin -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
