On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:44:41PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > -1 from me on merging those, I think there is value in having a lower > traffic channel where people can be focused on milestones (today it is not > really making a difference becasue #ubuntu-devel is quiet but let's hope > that moving to a more modern platform will bring back some activity). The > queuebot is also quite noisy during freezes and I think that would have an > negative impact on the #devel channel. > > That said I think we would benefit of some guideline/clarity on the purpose > of the channels. I do think that pings to the archive admin and SRU teams > would be better placed on #devel which is often not the case today.
The general sentiment seems to be -1 on merging the -devel and -release channels, so let's consider that dropped from my proposal. I think your point on needing guideline/clarity on purpose is a good one though. Could those wanting to keep the split define what belongs in which channel please? It seems reasonable to ask for that if we're going to keep the split, we need this anyway for a split to be useful in practice, and I'm interested to see if everyone actually agrees on what each side of the split is actually for :-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
