Hi Sébastien, On 1/21/25 04:44 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: [snip]
As we mention merging channels, I do wonder if we the #flavors split makes sense. Often the discussions there are about changes in the archive/Ubuntu Desktop/Server that are impacting flavors and it feels like using #ubuntu-devel would be better since then we would have a cross-groups shared space to resolve the problems. It would also help having a more active and engaging #ubuntu-devel channel.
Strong -1 on this. There are many discussions that only involve flavors, and thus should stay in that channel. Examples include but are not limited to: - Flavor syncs - Team-building between flavor members, and sharing of general information that does not involve development - @room pings for extremely important events that may not impact the wider Ubuntu Development community (we need specific socially-related flavor feedback from X, Y, Z) The Flavor channel is hardly a development channel; this move would not make sense. That being said, it **is** a requirement (*de facto*, soon to be *de jure*) that flavor leads stay in the Release channel, especially during critical times like releases and milestones. I think it makes sense to keep them separated. Thanks, -- Simon Quigley si...@tsimonq2.net @tsimonq2:ubuntu.com on Matrix tsimonq2 on LiberaChat and OFTC 5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8 C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
