হুমম. করছি কেননা সদস্য হতে হবে ঐ ডিসকাশনেরও যদি পড়তে চান: Discussion Which of the modern file systems do you prefer and why?
I'm currently planing on growing the storage capacity of my hobby system and at the same time I would like to pilot one of the more modern file systems. Posted 7 hours ago [image: Lari Korpi]<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=20729465&authToken=dKT2&authType=name> Lari Korpi<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=20729465&authToken=dKT2&authType=name> System Specialist at TietoEnator Processing & Network Oy See all Lari's discussions » <http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?searchQuestionsPostedByOther=&gid=49301&answerCategory=myans&memberID=20729465> Comment <http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=193735&gid=49301&trk=add-qa-disc-cThOon0JumNFomgJt7dBpSBA#comment-form> Your Comment: - or Cancel<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=193735&gid=49301&trk=add-qa-disc-cThOon0JumNFomgJt7dBpSBA#> Comments: 7 1. Rael Mussell<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=16027096&authToken=gHVb&authType=name> Sr. UNIX Admin at Credit Acceptance ZFS is *REALLY* nice. With Disk pooling in a sort of JBOD manner and active management of data with fault tolerance, I could easily see ZFS, if it was released under GNU for integration into Linux, as the future and primary FS type. Much like ext2 was the defacto standard for quite a few years. I also give praise to ext3, which has always proven reliable in terms of data recovery, but not necessarily in uptime. I have yet to be exposed to ext4 but I've heard nothing but great things about that one as well. Posted 6 hours ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=232976#commentID_232976> 2. Jean-François Gobin<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=14088047&authToken=oz6T&authType=name> Network Administrator at Stroz Friedberg, LLC Hey Lari, Which ... errr ... and modern ... double-err .... It frankly depends on what I'm doing. I tend to have a slight preference for xfs if I have to deal with large files (xfs with a good tuning is a real killer! But better be sure of your hardware!), or reiserfs for fs with lots of small files scattered in zillions of directories. I do enjoy ext3 as a all-purpose fs. But it needs a fair amount of tuning before being a real challenger. My preferences are, in decreasing order: xfs, reiserfs, ext3. That's when it comes to linux. On BSD, I find UFS+ quite cool. Jean Posted 6 hours ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=233276#commentID_233276> 3. Leandro DUTRA, Guimarães Faria Corcete<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=56997&authToken=LVQQ&authType=name> Data, Database and Systems Administrator, Architect, Modeller, Translator ReiserFS is a dead end. It always had issues, and its cool factor was misplaced — the ultimate vision for it was due to a misunderstanding of data concepts by its author, who by the way is now incarcerated and thus won't be able to continue his work. ext3 is mature and has the tools. ext4 impoves on it, so for a hobby system is an interesting proposition. Posted 5 hours ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=233454#commentID_233454> 4. Nickola Kolev<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=3805999&authToken=NRW7&authType=name> IT Manager/SNE I'm mostly a linux guy. That's why the number-one, all-purpose fs for me is IBM's jfs. It is rock solid (well, not in it's infancy times, before maybe 4-5 yrs ago), and performs equally well on large storage areas and on desktop machines. It IS fast, which should also be taken into account. After that, of course, comes ext3. This is currently the choise for any system, which needs to go the 'it just has to work' way. And... I've heard quite a lot of good opinions for zfs, but have never tested it personally. Posted 5 hours ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=233576#commentID_233576> 5. Rael Mussell<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=16027096&authToken=gHVb&authType=name> Sr. UNIX Admin at Credit Acceptance ReiserFS is a dead technology, heck the author is in jail for killing his wife, and is very unstable over a certain size and is a bear to recovery. I would NEVER and advocate directly against using ReiserFS for any production support. Posted 5 hours ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=233650#commentID_233650> 6. Rael Mussell<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=16027096&authToken=gHVb&authType=name> Sr. UNIX Admin at Credit Acceptance This comment was deleted by the author Posted 5 hours ago 7. [image: Asaf Maruf] Asaf Maruf<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=2669545&authToken=Yfft&authType=name> Technical Support Engineer Ext3, the file system that is default for Linux based systems has proven itself to be quite stable and able to handle different sized workloads and file sizes. It is a good all-rounder. I would look into ZFS from Sun as it promises to be a very high performance, high storage FS. It is open source so we can expect it to become better over time. Posted 4 hours ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=233836#commentID_233836> 2008/10/10 Shahriar Tariq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:28 AM, 9el <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Visit this.. A discussioin over the Linux's best file systems. > > > > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=193735&gid=49301&trk=add-qa-disc-cThOon0JumNFomgJt7dBpSBA > > > > > > লিঙ্কেডিন একাউন্ট নাই :( > অন্য কোন উপায় আছে দেখার??? > কপিপেস্ট করা যায় কোন খানে? > -- > ubuntu-bd mailing list > ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > -- ubuntu-bd mailing list ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
