On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:10:28AM -0400, Andrew Bradford wrote: > Dear Marek Vasut, > > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:34:18 +0200 > Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > > Dear Andrew Bradford, > > > > > Enable use of eserial devices for common and omap-common/spl. > > > > > > This probably isn't the right way to do this as the changes aren't > > > needed for 'common' configurations, just for one case. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Bradford <and...@bradfordembedded.com> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c | 7 ++++++- > > > common/console.c | 24 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++---- include/common.h | > > > 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c > > > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c index 4d1ac85..6258c0e 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c > > > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c > > > @@ -210,7 +210,12 @@ void preloader_console_init(void) > > > gd->flags |= GD_FLG_RELOC; > > > gd->baudrate = CONFIG_BAUDRATE; > > > > > > - serial_init(); /* serial communications > > > setup */ > > > + /* serial communications setup */ > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI > > > + ESERIAL_FUNC(CONFIG_CONS_INDEX, init)(); > > > > Uh, if you implement default_serial_console properly(), you won't > > need this. Actually, I'm in the process of rolling out V2 of my > > serial patchset, which will make your life much more easier. Can you > > rebase the patchset on my series? I'll poke you about it. > > I see that your serial patches have made it into u-boot/next, should I > rebase this patch set with the requested changes on top of u-boot/next > and resubmit? Sorry, I'm not entirely clear on the role /next plays.
Yes please, thanks. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
