Dear Marek Vasut, On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:34:18 +0200 Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Andrew Bradford, > > > Enable use of eserial devices for common and omap-common/spl. > > > > This probably isn't the right way to do this as the changes aren't > > needed for 'common' configurations, just for one case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Bradford <and...@bradfordembedded.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c | 7 ++++++- > > common/console.c | 24 > > ++++++++++++++++++++---- include/common.h | > > 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c > > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c index 4d1ac85..6258c0e 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c > > @@ -210,7 +210,12 @@ void preloader_console_init(void) > > gd->flags |= GD_FLG_RELOC; > > gd->baudrate = CONFIG_BAUDRATE; > > > > - serial_init(); /* serial communications > > setup */ > > + /* serial communications setup */ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI > > + ESERIAL_FUNC(CONFIG_CONS_INDEX, init)(); > > Uh, if you implement default_serial_console properly(), you won't > need this. Actually, I'm in the process of rolling out V2 of my > serial patchset, which will make your life much more easier. Can you > rebase the patchset on my series? I'll poke you about it. I see that your serial patches have made it into u-boot/next, should I rebase this patch set with the requested changes on top of u-boot/next and resubmit? Sorry, I'm not entirely clear on the role /next plays. Or is it recommended to rebase my changes on top of the tree I worked with before but with your serial patches applied? Or some other method? Thanks, Andrew _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
