Hi,
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 13:58:57 -0700, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> On 09/06/2012 12:28 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> > Hi Nobuhiro,
>> >
>> > On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:20:59 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
>> > <iwama...@nigauri.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi, Tom.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote:
>> >>> On 09/05/2012 04:18 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> >>>> Hi Nobuhiro,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:26:37 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
>> >>>> <iwama...@nigauri.org> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:15:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> >>>>>>> Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> In message
>> >>>>>>> <CABMQnVLBEEjcEtfTzdeThHfTLp=b24qsognfjbzr-8ywytj...@mail.gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> you wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I am working supporting Renesas RMOBILE to U-Boot.
>> >>>>>>>> Renesas's RMOBILE SoC family contains an ARM Cortex-A9, and
>> >>>>>>>> this uses the same IP as SH.
>> >>>>>>>> (For example, timer, ether, serial, etc.)
>> >>>>>>>> I already sent to patches of rmobile, I got review from some
>> >>>>>>>> developers. And the patch is managed by the arm/rmobile
>> >>>>>>>> branch of u-boot-sh[0] which I have maintained, now.
>> >>>>>>>> Since I had you take the patch of rmobile into an ARM
>> >>>>>>>> repository, I consulted with Albert about the
>> >>>>>>>> future development approach.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> We thought two methods are considered.
>> >>>>>>>> One is Albert picks up a patch from ML to ARM repository,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> As this is ARM code, this appears the most natural approach to
>> >>>>>>> me
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Another is whether to have pull from the repository by
>> >>>>>>>> having a repository for rmobile made.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> If this is an ARM SoC, then it should go through the ARM repo
>> >>>>>>> - even if we should later decide that there is so much traffic
>> >>>>>>> that a separate rmobile repo would be sustified, thi would
>> >>>>>>> still be a sub-repo, which Albert would pull from.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Another option, which Mike is using for, iirc, sf and blackfin,
>> >>>>>> is just to add rmobile-master / rmobile-next as branches to the
>> >>>>>> u-boot-sh repository.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Yes, this is one of easy way. But Albert won't pull form
>> >>>>> u-boot-sh, if If my understanding is not wrong.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This just means that they'll end up on u-boot/master from
>> >>>> u-boot.sh (and from there into u-boot-arm later on).
>> >>>
>> >>> To be clear, what I'm saying is just add a few more branches to
>> >>> u-boot-sh that Albert will pull (since they're ARM stuff). Say
>> >>> u-boot-sh/rmobile/master and u-boot-sh/rmobile/next. Then not get
>> >>> too hung up on which repository a merge message comes from. :)
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I was going to do by how to explain you.
>> >> However, I think that Albert mistook by my shortage of explanation.
>> >> Thank you for following up.
>> >>
>> >> Nobuhiro
>> >
>> > I understand that some ARM patches would be stored in some branch
>> > (say rmobile/master) of the u-boot-sh repo and pull-requested to me
>> > from there.
>> >
>> > What I still don't understand is *why* this should be done. Before
>> > they get on this branch, the patches would still have to go through
>> > the mailing list for review, just like the ARM patches that end up
>> > applied to u-boot-arm/master, except they'd have to do through an
>> > intermediate branch. If there are benefits in this, someone will
>> > have to lay them out for me, because right now I don't see them.
>>
>> I think the answer is, given how you wish to work, there's not. It's
>> a workflow problem only. If it's no easier for you to get a pull
>> request from Nobuhiro once the patches have been reviewed than for
>> you to pull them out of patchwork once they have been reviewed, then
>> since your preference is for patchwork, via patchwork and into
>> u-boot-arm is how they'll work.
>
> Thanks for this answer. I personally prefer applying patches from
> patchwork directly into u-boot-arm/master.
>
OK, could you pickup rmobile patches from patchwork, please?
But I already archived rmobile patches in patchwork......
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
