Hi, On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:15:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, >> >> In message >> <CABMQnVLBEEjcEtfTzdeThHfTLp=b24qsognfjbzr-8ywytj...@mail.gmail.com> you >> wrote: >> > >> > I am working supporting Renesas RMOBILE to U-Boot. >> > Renesas's RMOBILE SoC family contains an ARM Cortex-A9, and this uses >> > the same IP as SH. >> > (For example, timer, ether, serial, etc.) >> > I already sent to patches of rmobile, I got review from some developers. >> > And the patch is managed by the arm/rmobile branch of u-boot-sh[0] >> > which I have maintained, now. >> > Since I had you take the patch of rmobile into an ARM repository, I >> > consulted with Albert about the >> > future development approach. >> > >> > We thought two methods are considered. >> > One is Albert picks up a patch from ML to ARM repository, >> >> As this is ARM code, this appears the most natural approach to me. >> >> > Another is whether to have pull from the repository by having a >> > repository for rmobile made. >> >> If this is an ARM SoC, then it should go through the ARM repo - even >> if we should later decide that there is so much traffic that a >> separate rmobile repo would be sustified, thi would still be a >> sub-repo, which Albert would pull from. > > Another option, which Mike is using for, iirc, sf and blackfin, is just > to add rmobile-master / rmobile-next as branches to the u-boot-sh > repository.
Yes, this is one of easy way. But Albert won't pull form u-boot-sh, if If my understanding is not wrong. Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org} GPG ID: 40AD1FA6 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot