Hi, On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, > > In message > <CABMQnVLBEEjcEtfTzdeThHfTLp=b24qsognfjbzr-8ywytj...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: >> >> I am working supporting Renesas RMOBILE to U-Boot. >> Renesas's RMOBILE SoC family contains an ARM Cortex-A9, and this uses >> the same IP as SH. >> (For example, timer, ether, serial, etc.) >> I already sent to patches of rmobile, I got review from some developers. >> And the patch is managed by the arm/rmobile branch of u-boot-sh[0] >> which I have maintained, now. >> Since I had you take the patch of rmobile into an ARM repository, I >> consulted with Albert about the >> future development approach. >> >> We thought two methods are considered. >> One is Albert picks up a patch from ML to ARM repository, > > As this is ARM code, this appears the most natural approach to me. > >> Another is whether to have pull from the repository by having a >> repository for rmobile made. > > If this is an ARM SoC, then it should go through the ARM repo - even > if we should later decide that there is so much traffic that a > separate rmobile repo would be sustified, thi would still be a > sub-repo, which Albert would pull from. >
Yes, I understood these. But Albert said "I won't pull from u-boot-sh.git. becauase this repository is not ARM tree." in the inside of mail with him. I think that I also want rmobile to receive request-pull like other ARM SoCs if possible. Of course, I want to take precedence to the code of rmobile being taken in. Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org} GPG ID: 40AD1FA6 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot