On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:15:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, > > In message > <CABMQnVLBEEjcEtfTzdeThHfTLp=b24qsognfjbzr-8ywytj...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: > > > > I am working supporting Renesas RMOBILE to U-Boot. > > Renesas's RMOBILE SoC family contains an ARM Cortex-A9, and this uses > > the same IP as SH. > > (For example, timer, ether, serial, etc.) > > I already sent to patches of rmobile, I got review from some developers. > > And the patch is managed by the arm/rmobile branch of u-boot-sh[0] > > which I have maintained, now. > > Since I had you take the patch of rmobile into an ARM repository, I > > consulted with Albert about the > > future development approach. > > > > We thought two methods are considered. > > One is Albert picks up a patch from ML to ARM repository, > > As this is ARM code, this appears the most natural approach to me. > > > Another is whether to have pull from the repository by having a > > repository for rmobile made. > > If this is an ARM SoC, then it should go through the ARM repo - even > if we should later decide that there is so much traffic that a > separate rmobile repo would be sustified, thi would still be a > sub-repo, which Albert would pull from.
Another option, which Mike is using for, iirc, sf and blackfin, is just to add rmobile-master / rmobile-next as branches to the u-boot-sh repository. -- Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
