Hi Albert,
On 04.09.12 21:34, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:17:58 +0200, Andreas Bießmann
> <andreas.de...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Albert Aribaud,
>>
>> On 16.08.12 20:22, Markus Hubig wrote:
>>> The board_postclk_init() function can be used to perform operations
>>> that requires a working timer early within the U-Boot init_sequence.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig <mhu...@imko.de>
>>> Cc: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/lib/board.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/board.c b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> index f1951e8..109a1ac 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c
>>> @@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ init_fnc_t *init_sequence[] = {
>>> fdtdec_check_fdt,
>>> #endif
>>> timer_init, /* initialize timer */
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BOARD_POSTCLK_INIT
>>> + board_postclk_init,
>>> +#endif
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC
>>> get_clocks,
>>> #endif
>>>
>>
>> how do you think about this suggestion? Will you accept it? Should I
>> apply both patches to u-boot-atmel?
>
> From what I see, this converges with what's been in PPC for a long
> time... I'm ok with the series going into atmel.
So I add a formal Acked-by from you?
Best regards
Andreas Bießmann
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
